پراکنش پوسته های زیستی خاک در سطوح تحول سنی یک مخروط افکنه نیمه‌خشک

نوع مقاله : علمی -پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت مناطق بیابانی- دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

2 گروه مدیریت مناطق خشک و بیابانی- دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

3 دانشیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

4 استادیار گروه زیست شناسی- دانشکده علوم- دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

10.29252/esrj.9.1.1

چکیده

پوسته­ های زیستی خاک اجتماعی تنگاتنگ بین ذرات خاک و سیانوباکتری، جلبک، قارچ، گلسنگ­ها و خزه­ ها هستند که بر روی سطح خاک یا در داخل چند میلیمتر فوقانی خاک زندگی می­کنند. در این پژوهش به بررسی اثر ژئومورفولوژی بر توزیع زیستگاهی پوسته­ های زیستی خاک در امتداد تحول سنی یک مخروط­ افکنه واقع در دامنه­ های نیمه­ خشک بینالود جنوبی در خراسان رضوی پرداخته شده است. نمونه­ برداری در فصل تابستان و بصورت سیستماتیک در طول تسلسل زمانی لندفرم­ها با استفاده از پلات 25/0 متر مربعی و در ضخامت 5 سانتیمتری سطح خاک صورت گرفت. سطح لندفرم به سه طبقه ساختاری قدیمی، میانه و جدید دسته­بندی شد و هر طبقه به 4 قسمت تقسیم و پلات­ها به صورت تصادفی انتخاب گردید. در هر سطح 16 نمونه­برداری صورت گرفت که در مجموع 48 نمونه برداشت گردید. نتایج حاکی از آن است که ژئومورفولوژی به طور غیرمستقیم بر توزیع پوسته­ های زیستی خاک که در نتیجه تفاوت در تخصیص پارامترهای خاک می باشد اثر می­گذارد از جمله با کاهش pH و کلسیم کربنات و افزایش رطوبت خاک در طول گرادیان باعث افزایش پوشش پوسته­های زیستی خاک می­گردد. در نتیجه تفاوت قابل توجهی در توزیع انواع مختلف پوسته­ های بیولوژیک خاک در چشم­انداز بیابان طبیعی وجود دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Distribution of biological soil crust along surface evolution of an arid alluvial fan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahvan Hassanzadeh Bashtian 1
  • Adel Sepehr 2
  • Mohammad Farzam 3
  • Masoumeh Bahreini 4
1 MSc student of Desert Region Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Dept. of Desert and Arid Zone Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Dept. of Rangelands and Watershed Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 Dept. of Biology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction

Studying the relationship between the living world, geomorphic processes, and landforms, developed a new branch of Earth's surface process that called Biogeomorphology. There is a significant correlation between morphological changes and soil physicochemical and biological properties. Desert ecosystems comprise about one-third of the Earth's land surface, and a collection of geomorphological elements, such as the structure of landforms, alluvial fans, and Playa's sand dunes. A common feature of arid and semi-arid environments, there is sporadic vegetation. In these areas, below vascular plants scattered and empty space between them creates a fertile environment for the emergence of nonvascular plants, which the so-called refers to biological soil crusts (BSCs). They have low water requirements and high tolerance to temperature and sunlight and therefore are able to continue their life under conditions that limit the growth of vascular plants. Although biological soil crusts are very widespread in arid regions, just covers more than 40 percent of the Earth's surface. Biological soil crusts are communities of tiny organisms consists of cyanobacteria, green algae, lichens, mosses and others associated closely with particles of surface soil, forming a cohesive thin horizontal layer. The structure of biological soil crust makes binding soil particles and have a significant effect on the stability of the soil and resistance role to erosion. n addition, BSC maintains soil moisture, reduces the pH amount and increase the availability of nutrients and providing nitrogen, which leads to vegetation cover. Soil-geomorphic relationship in arid areas forms BSC regarding geomorphology evolution. In this study, we examined the compatibility of biological soil crusts under soil physicochemical characteristics along alluvial fan with different geomorphic structures.

Materials & Methods

The research was applied in an arid alluvial fan located in Khorasan Razavi province eastern north Iran at Binaloud hillslopes. The study areas includes Quaternary formations and alluvial deposits with contained formations of hard limestone, sandstone, and quartzite. A relation between the dynamic morphology landforms with dynamic chronology (temporal evolution) was considered based on Davis evolutionary approach. The records by imagery data and field observations identified three different relative ages of geomorphology on the debris of alluvial fan including old, middle, and new formations from apex to base of fan. For biological soil crust, cover percentage, biomass, and amount of chlorophyll a and b were analyzed. Soil samples were measured in terms of physicochemical properties such as soil moisture, soil particle size, EC, pH, percent calcium carbonate, N, P, K, Na, Ca, Mg, and organic carbon.

Results and Discussion

The findings showed that BSCs distributed on debris alluvial fan involve a complex assembly regarding two or three combinations of cyanobacteria, green algae, lichen, and moss. Results indicated that geomorphology factors govern biological soil crusts dynamics significantly from apex point of alluvial fan towards base surfaces, which beck to deposition and soil properties. Deposits of apex and top points showed generally more coarse texture and poorer sorting and roundness, in front an increasing trend is in deposits from top towards base points, so we found fine deposits on base surfaces. This sorting and roundness status led to better water drainage ratio from the highlands to the lowlands and thus increasing the mosses and lichens in BSCs. In other words, from old structures to the new structures, the distribution pattern of biological soil crusts in primary sequences is related to cyanobacteria and green algae and cyanolichen and in the final sequence is regarded to lichens and mosses.
Soil texture indicates the relative frequency of sand, silt, and clay that could be changed by soil moisture conditions. Thus, results showed that soil texture could be effected on species composition and distribution of BSCs. The soil texture in this study generally lights to moderate and belongs to the class loam. There is more silt in the soil, thus increased coverage of BSCs.
With the development of BSCs (from primary sequences such as cyanobacteria to the final sequence, such as mosses and lichens), reduced the amount of calcium carbonate and soil pH.
New structures have more organic carbon compared to other structures and there is inverse relationship between organic carbon and soil pH, also increasing trend on carbon fixation in the presence of lichens and mosses. The soil nitrogen content in new structures with mosses and lichens almost 1.5 times against the soil old structures. This finding confirmed the results of multiple studies of the biological soil crust regarding soil nitrogen increasing even up to 200%.
Results showed that in the middle structures, amount of magnesium, calcium, sodium, and potassium significantly increased compared to other structures, because these elements are attached to the external surface of the cell wall lichens. When lichens are dry and wet, these elements of the wall of lichen washed into the soil, and because of the positive charge by the colloids of clay which have a negative charge are absorbed, thus increasing the amount of them in these soils.

Conclusions

In this study was investigated the distribution of biological soil crusts in connection with the physicochemical properties of soil and geomorphological features in the dynamic morphology of the alluvial fan in the arid region. In the old structures and heights, with soil textures lighter and above pH levels of the soil, placed dominated by the primary sequences of cyanobacteria and green algae. While increasing the amount of silt and loamy soil makes new structures retain more moisture and thus is associated with the development of mosses and lichens in the next sequence. Different types or levels of different geomorphic causing change the distribution and species distribution of biological soil crusts. Lithology and sediment level showed a strong role in determining the structure of biological soil crusts.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biogeomorphology
  • Biological Soil Crusts
  • Landform evolution
  • Alluvial fan
  1. Belnap J. 2003. Microbes and Microfauna Associated with Biological Soil Crusts. In Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management, ed. J Belnap, O Lange:167-74: Springer-Verlag:Berlin. Number of 167-74 pp
  2. -Belnap J, B¨udel B, Lange OL. (2003). Biological soil crusts: characteristics and distribution. In Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management, Belnap J, Lange OL (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 3–30.
  3. -Belnap, J., Prasse, R. &Harper, K. (2001b). 21 Influence of Biological Soil Crusts on Soil Environments and Vascular Plants. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management 150: 283
  4. -Beymer, R.J., and Klopatek, J.M. 1991. Potential contribution of carbon by microphytic crusts in pinyon-juniper woodlands. Arid soil Research and Rehabilitation, 5: 187-98.
  5. -Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 54:464-465
  6. -Bowker MA, Belnap J, Davidson DW, Phillips SL. 2005. Evidence for micronutrient limitation of biological soil crusts: importance to arid-land restoration. Ecological Applications 15: 1941–1951.
  7. -Bowker MA. 2007. Biological soil crust rehabilitation in theory and practice: an underexploited opportunity Restoration Ecology 15: 13–23.
  8. -Bremner, J.M., Mulvaney, C.S. (1982): Methods of soil analysis, part 2 chemical and microbiological properties, 595-624.
  9. -Chamizo, S., Canton, Y., Lazaro, R., Sole-Benet, A., and Domingo, F. (2012 a). Crust composition and disturbance drive infiltration through biological soil crusts in semiarid ecosystems. Ecosystems, 15(1), 148-161.
  10. -Corenblit, D., Baas, A.C.W., Bornette, G., Darrozes, J., Delmotte, S., Francis, R.A., Gurnell, A.M., Julien, F., Naiman, R.J., Steiger, J., 2011. Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: A review of foundation concepts and current understandings, Earth-Science Reviews 106, 307–331.
  11. -Dainin, A., and Ganor, E. 1991. Trapping of airborn dust by mosses in the Negev Desert Earth Surf process Landforms, 16: 153-162.
  12. -DeFAlco, L. A., 1995. Influence of cryptobiotic soil crusts on winter annuals and foraging movements of the desert tortoise. Department of Biology. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Co. USA.
  13. -Goudie, A., 2002. Great Warm Deserts of the World: Landscape and Evolution, 1st ed. Oxford University Press USA, New York, NY.
  14. -Goudie, A.S. and Middleton, N.J. (2006) Desert Dust in the Global System. Springer.
  15. -Haussmann, N.S., 2011. Biogeomorphology: understanding different research approaches. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 36, 136–138.
  16. -Kleiner EF, Harper KT. 1977. Soil properties in relation to cryptogamic groundcover in Canyonlands National Park. Journal of Range Management 30: 202–205.
  17. -Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and MicrobiologicaI Properties, second edition, Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI; 225–246.
  18. -Li XR, Jia XH, Long LQ, Zerbe S. 2005. Effects of biological soil crusts on seed bank, germination and establishment of two annual plant species in the Tengger Desert (N China). Plant and Soil 277: 375–385.
  19. -Li XR, Wang XP, Li T, Zhang JG. 2002. Microbiotic crust and its effect on vegetation and habitat on artifi cially stabilized desert dunes in Tengger Desert, North China. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35: 147–154.
  20. -Lichtenhaler HK, Wellburn AR. 1983. Determination of total caroteniod and chlorophyll a and b of leaf extract in different solvent. Biochemistry Society Transaction 603: 591–592.
  21. -Miralles I., Trasar-Cepeda C., Leiros M.C., and Gil-Sotres F. 2012. Labile carbon in biological soil crusts in the Tabernas desert, SE Spain. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 5:1-.8.
  22. -Naylor, L.A., Viles, H.A., Carter, N.E.A., 2002. Biogeomorphology revisited: looking towards the future. Geomorphology 47, 3–14.
  23. -Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, second edition, Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI; 539–577.
  24. -Olsen, S.R., C.V. Cole, F.S. Watanabe, and L.A. Dean. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Dep. of Agric. Circ. 939.
  25. -Patton, P.C. Alexander, S. and Kramer, F.L. 1970. Physical Geomorphology, Wand-sworth Publishing Compny, Belmont, California.
  26. -Phillips, S.L., and Belnap, J. 1998. Shifting carbon dynamics due to the effects of Bromus tectorum invasion on biological soil crusts. Ecological Bulletin, 79: 205.
  27. -Pietrasiak, N., Johansen, J.R., Drenovsky, R.E., 2011a. Geologic composition influences distribution of microbiotic crusts in the Mojave and Colorado Deserts at the regional scale. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 967–974.
  28. -Pietrasiak, N., Johansen, J.R., LaDoux, T., Graham, R.C., 2011b. Spatial distribution and comparison of disturbance impacts to microbiotic soil crust in the Little San Bernardino Mountains of Joshua Tree National Park, California. West. N. Am. Nat. 71, 539–552.
  29. -Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S.C., de Ruiter, P.C., van de Koppel, J., 2004. Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 30, 1926–1929.
  30. -Whitford W. 2002. Ecology of Desert Systems. Academic Press: San Diego, CA; 343.
  31. -Williams A., Buck B., Soukup D., Merkler D. 2010. Geomorphic controls of biological soil crust distribution, Mojave Desert (USA). World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World.