سناریوهای خطرپذیری زمین‌لرزه در مناطق شهری (مورد‌پژوهی: شهر اردبیل)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه جغرافیا، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: ارزیابی خطرپذیری لرزه­ای در مقیاس شهری یک فعالیت ضروری برای ارزیابی پیامدهای بالقوه زمین­لرزه­های بزرگ است. این روش متشکل از یک سری مراحل پژوهشی سیستماتیک است که با شناسایی خطر لرزه­ای آغاز ­شده و با ارزیابی آسیب­پذیری ساختمان­ها ادامه می­یابد. تأثیر سناریوهای لرزه­ای بر روی ساکنین شهر اردبیل، هدف نهایی این مطالعه است تا ضمن فراهم ­ساختن اطلاعات کارآمد در مورد ارزیابی آسیب­پذیری لرزه­ای برنامه عملیاتی شهری به ­روز رسانی گردد.
مواد و روش­ها: در این تحقیق از روشی مبتنی بر شاخص آسیب­پذیری برای ارزیابی خسارت مورد انتظار در اردبیل استفاده شده است. این روش یک شاخص آسیب­پذیری را برای نمایش و تعیین اینکه آیا یک ساختمان به طبقه آسیب­پذیری خاص تعلق دارد، معرفی می­کند. این روش از میانگین توابع آسیب­پذیری نیمه تجربی استفاده می­کند که برای یک شاخص آسیب­پذیری معین به با لرزه­خیزی و خسارت مورد انتظار کاملا مرتبط است. تحلیل خطرپذیری برای سناریوهای لرزه­ای تعریف شده با شدت­های لرزه­ای V، V-VI، VI،VI-VII  و VII برای طراحی طرح­های اضطراری لرزه­ای انجام شده است.
نتایج و بحث: آسیب­پذیری بالا باعث آسیب فیزیکی مستقیم قابل توجهی به ساختمان­ها می­شود، حتی برای زمین­لرزه­های با شدت کم. در نتیجه خسارت فیزیکی مورد انتظار در صورت وقوع زمین­لرزه­های متوسط قابل توجه است. برای زمین­لرزه­ای با بزرگی V، انتظار نمی­رود خسارت قابل توجهی باشد، اما برای سناریوی با بزرگی VII، هر پنج منطقه و بافت­های فرسوده درون آن­ها سطحی از آسیب را تجربه خواهند کرد که اندکی بیشتر است. در بین مناطق پنج­گانه شهری، منطقه 2 به دلیل تراکم ارتفاعی بیشترین تاثیر اقتصادی را خواهد داشت و برای سناریوی با شدت VII حدود 261 میلیارد ریال هزینه خواهد داشت. تاثیر اقتصادی زمین­لرزه­ای برای مناطق پنج گانه از 101 میلیارد ریال برای زمین­لرزه­ای با بزرگای V-VI تا 844 برای زمین­لرزه­ای با بزرگای 7 است. با توجه به تاثیر یک بحران لرزه­ای، حجم قابل توجهی از تولید آوار وجود دارد. همچنین در چنین شرایطی 29 درصد از کل شهروندان اردبیلی بی­خانمان می­شوند.
نتیجه ­گیری: شهر اردبیل در محدوده خطر لرزه­ای متوسط تا زیاد قرار دارد که در آئین­نامه لرزه­ای فعلی کشور با زلزله­ای خاص با بزرگی VII  و شتاب مربوط به آن 04/0 گرم شناسایی شده است. شهر و اطراف آن از خطر لرزه‌ای نسبتاً بالایی برخوردار است که عمدتاً به دلیل جمعیت زیاد و ساختمان‌های قدیمی و آسیب‌پذیر است. آسیب­پذیری ساختمان­ها در اردبیل میانگین مقدار 59/0 را برای ساختمان­های بتنی و 93/0 را برای ساختمان­های بنایی نشان می­دهد. بنابراین پیش­بینی می­شود که سازه­های بنایی دارای درجه آسیب بالاتری باشند، زیرا الگوی آسیب­پذیری به الگوی آسیب منتقل می­شود. شاخص آسیب­پذیری مناطق 1 (950/0) و 3 (850/0) بالاتر از سایر مناطق است. از سوی دیگر، با توجه به افزایش زیرساخت­ها و خدمات در مناطق، یک تا چهار عنصر آسیب­پذیر به­طور مداوم در حال افزایش است. بنابراین، تنها راه کاهش خطر لرزه­ای با رویکرد کاهش آسیب­پذیری، اقدامات سخت­گیرانه مقررات لرزه­ای و افزایش آگاهی عمومی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Earthquake risk scenarios in urban areas (Case study: Ardabil city)

نویسنده [English]

  • Rasoul Samadzadeh
Department of Geography, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Urban-scale seismic risk assessment is an essential activity to assess the potential consequences of large earthquakes. This method includes a series of systematic research steps that begin with the identification of seismic hazard, continue with the assessment of the vulnerability of buildings and end with the development of hazard plans and appropriate mitigation plans. The Impact of Seismic Scenarios on the Ardabil City, the ultimate goal of this study is to provide up-to-date information on the seismic vulnerability assessment of the urban operational plan.
Materials and methods: In this study, a method based on the vulnerability index has been used to assess the expected damage in Ardabil. This method introduces a vulnerability index to display and determine whether a building belongs to a particular vulnerability class. This method uses the mean of quasi-experimental vulnerability functions, which for a given vulnerability index is strongly associated with seismicity and expected damage. Risk analysis for seismic scenarios defined by seismic intensities V, V-VI, VI, VI-VII and VII has been performed to design seismic emergency plans.
Results and Discussion: High vulnerability causes significant direct physical damage to buildings, even for low-intensity earthquakes. As a result, the expected physical damage in the case of moderate earthquakes is significant. For a magnitude V earthquake, the damage is not expected to be significant, but for a magnitude VII scenario, all five areas and the dilapidated textures within them will experience a level of damage that is slightly higher. Among the five urban areas, Region 2 will have the greatest economic impact due to its high-altitude density, and will cost approximately 261 billion rials for the VII intensity scenario. The economic impact of the earthquake for the five regions is from 101 billion rials for the earthquake with magnitude V-VI to 844 for the earthquake with magnitude VII. Due to the impact of a seismic crisis, there is a significant volume of expected debris production. In addition, under such circumstances, 29% of the total citizens of Ardabil become homeless.
Conclusion: The city of Ardabil is in the range of moderate to high seismic hazard, which in the current seismic norm of the country has been identified by a specific earthquake with a magnitude of VII and a related acceleration of 0.04g. The city and its environs have a relatively high seismic risk, mainly due to the large population and old and vulnerable buildings. Vulnerability of buildings in Ardabil shows an average value of 0.59 for concrete buildings and 0.93 for masonry buildings. Therefore, masonry structures are predicted to have a higher degree of damage, because the pattern of vulnerability is transferred to the pattern of damage. The vulnerability index of regions 1 (0.950) and 3 (0.850) is higher than other regions. On the other hand, due to the increase in infrastructure and services in areas, one to four vulnerable elements are constantly increasing. Therefore, the only way to reduce seismic risk with a vulnerability reduction approach is through strict measures of seismic regulations and raising public awareness.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Physical vulnerability
  • Ardabil
  • Vulnerability index
  • Risk scenario

مراجع

-ATC-13., 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13, 492, Redwook City, California: Applied Technology Council, 121 p.
-Baitullah, A. and Razagian, G., 2018. Zoning of Iran based on changes in the ratio of seismicity coefficients a / b. Journal of Advanced Applied Geology, v. 29, p. 75-83.
-Belheouane, F.I. and Bensaibi, M., 2013. Assessment of Vulnerability Curves Using Vulnerability Index Method for Reinforced Concrete Structures, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, v. 7(6), p. 485-488.
-Baitullah, A. and Razagian, G., 2018. Zoning of Iran based on changes in the ratio of seismicity coefficients a / b. Journal of Advanced Applied Geology, v. 29, p. 83-75 (in Persian).
-Coburn, A. and Spence, R., 1992. Earthquake Protection, 355, Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 355 p.
-Coburn, A. and Spence, R., 2002. Earthquake Protection, 420. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 436 p.
-Despotaki, V., Silva, V., Lagomarsino, S., Pavlova, I. and Torres, J., 2018. Evaluation of Seismic Risk on UNESCO Cultural Heritage sites in Europe, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503374.
-Esfandiari, F., Ghafari, A. and Lotfi, K., 2013. Modeling the vulnerability coefficient of cities against earthquakes using the TOPSIS method in the GIS environment (case study: Ardabil city), scientific-research quarterly of quantitative geomorphology researches, second year, v. 2, p. 43-79.
-Esfandiari, F., Ghafari, A. and Lotfi, K., 2013. Modeling the vulnerability coefficient of cities against earthquakes using the TOPSIS method in the GIS environment (Case study: Ardabil city), scientific-research quarterly of quantitative geomorphology researches, second year, v. 2, p. 43-79 (in Persian).
-FEMA., 1997. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-273, Washington, DC: US Federal Emergency Management Agency.
-FEMA/NIBS., 2002. HAZUS Technical Manual -SR2. Washington D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA and National Institute of Building Sciences, NIBS.1, 2, 3.
-Ferlito, R. and Pizz, A.G., 2011. Vulnerability Model of an urban centre. Methodology for a Quick Evaluation of Emergency Road Network Vulnerability, v. 28(4), p. 31-49.
-Ghalamghash, J., Mousavi, S.Z., Hassanzadeh, J. and Schmitt, A.K., 2016. Geology, Zircon Geochronology, and Petrogenesis of Sabalan Volcano (Northwestern Iran), Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 327, p. 192-207.
-Giovinazzi, S., 2005. The vulnerability assessment and the damage Scenario in seismic risk analysis, PhD dissertation, The Department of Civil Engineering of the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina at Braunschweig and the Faculty of Engineering Department of Civil Engineering of the University of Florence, Accessed October 11, 2017. https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00001757.
-Giovinazzi, S. and Lagomarsino, S., 2002. WP04: Guidelines for the implementation of the 1 level methodology for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings, Risk-UE report, Genoa, Italy doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01).
-Grünthal, G.Ed., 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Vol. 15. Luxemburg: Centre Européen de Géodynamique et Séismologie, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie.
-Imani, B. and Pourkhosravani, M., 2016. Spatial analysis of hazardous areas in Ardabil city, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geography and Environmental Planning, v. 28, p. 128-109.
-Imani, B. and Pourkhosravani, M., 2016. Spatial analysis of hazardous areas in Ardabil city, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geography and Environmental Planning, v. 28, p. 109-128 (in Persian).
-Lagomarsino, S. and Giovinazzi, S., 2006. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, v. 4(4), p. 415-43. Doi: 10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z.
-Lantada, N., 2007. Evaluación del riesgo sísmico mediante métodos avanzados y técnicas GIS. Aplicación a la ciudad de Barcelona. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Dpto. De Ingeniería del terreno cartográficay geofísica. http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/6259.
-Lantada, N., Pujades, L.G. and Barbat, A.H., 2018. Earthquake Risk Scenarios in Urban Areas: A Review with Applications to the Ciutat Vella District in Barcelona, Spain, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503367.
-Lantada, N., Rizarry, I.J., Barbat, A.H., Goula, X., Roca, A., Susagna, T. and Pujades, L.G., 2010. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. Bulletin Earthquake Engineering, v. 8, p. 201-29. Doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z.
-Lantada, N., Pujades, L.G. and Barbat, A.H., 2009a. Escenarios de riesgo sísmico para la Barcelona. Plad’Actuació d’Emergència Municipal (PAEM) en cas de sisme” en coordinación con el Plan de Emergencia SÍSmica de CATaluña (SISMICAT), UPC, Barcelona.
-Lantada, N., Pujades, L.G. and Barbat, A.H., 2009b. Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum-based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation, A comparison, Natural Hazards, v. 51, p. 15-24. Doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9212-4.
-Lestuzzi, P., Podesta, S., Luchini, C., Garofano, A., KazantzidouFirtinidou, D., Bozzano, C., Bischof, P., Haffter, A. and Rouiller, J.D., 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale for two typical Swiss cities using Risk-Ue methodology, Natural Hazards, v. 84, p. 249-69. Doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2420-z.
-Maio, R., 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: Case study of the old city centre of Faro, Portugal Journal of Risk Research, v. 19(5), p. 551-80. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.988285.
-Milutinovic, Z.V. and Trendafiloski, G.S., 2003. WP04 Vulnerability of current buildings. RISK-UE project of the EC: an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns.
-Mouroux, P. and Lebrun, B., 2006a. RISK-UE project: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns. In Assessing and managing earthquake risk, eds. C. S. Oliveira, A. Roca, and X. Goula, Berlin: Springer.
-Mouroux, P. and Lebrun, B., 2006b. Presentation of RISK-UE Project. Bull Earthq Eng. Special Issue: Earthquake Scenarios for European Cities, v. 4(4), p. 323-339.
-Oliveira, V., 2016. Urban morphology. An introduction to the study of the physical form of cities, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 192 p.
-Pilone, E., Mussini, P., Demichela, M. and Camuncoli, G., 2017. Reprint of: Municipal Emergency Plans in Italy: Requirements and drawbacks, Safety Science, v. 97, p. 43-50. Doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.032.
-Rivas-Medina, A., Gaspar-Escribano, J.M., Benito, B. and Bernabe, M.A., 2013. The role of GIS in urban seismic risk studies: Application to the city of Almería (southern Spain). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, v. 13(11), p. 12-27. Doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-2717-2013.
-Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center., 2014. Earthquake Design Regulations for Buildings, Standard 2800.Tehran, Issue No. Z-253 (in Persian).
-Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center., 2014. Earthquake Design Regulations for Buildings, Standard 2800.Tehran, Issue No. Z-253.
-Samadzadeh, R., 1398. Geomorphology of Iran, Samat Publishing, Tehran, 486 p (in Persian).
-Samadzadeh, R., 2014. The height of the ice and water balance line, a factor preventing the development of human settlements in the eastern slopes of Sablan, Proceedings of the first national conference on sustainable rural physical-spatial development, 2nd and 3rd of July, Tehran, Foundation Maskan Islamic Revolution, p. 207-223 (in Persian).
-Samadzadeh, R., Khayyam M. and Hosseini Amini, H., 2010. A New Isight to the Geomorphological Evolution of the Ardabil Tectonic Depression with a Landscaping Approach, Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, v 21, p. 105-130 (in Persian).
-Samadzadeh, R., 1398. Geomorphology of Iran, Samat Publishing, Tehran, 486 p.
-Samadzadeh, R., 2014. The height of the ice and water balance line, a factor preventing the development of human settlements in the eastern slopes of Sablan, Proceedings of the first national conference on sustainable rural physical-spatial development, 2nd and 3rd of July, Tehran, Foundation Maskan Islamic Revolution, p. 207-223.
-Samadzadeh, R., Khayyam, M. and Hosseini Amini, H., 2010. A New Isight to the Geomorphological Evolution of the Ardabil Tectonic Depression with a Landscaping Approach, Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, v. 21, p. 105-130.
-Staniscia, S.E., Spacone, P. and Fabieteti, V., 2017. Performance based urban planning: framework and L’Aquila historic city center case study, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, v. 11(5), p. 1-28. doi:10.1080/15583058.2017.1287977.
-Srikanth, T., Kumar, R.P., Singh, A.P., Rastogi, B.K. and Kumar, S., 2010. Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Buildings in Gandhidham and Adipur Cities Kachchh, Gujarat (India), European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X, v. 41, p. 336-353.
-Taffarel, S., Da Porto, F., Valluzzi, M.R. and Modena, C., 2018. Comparing expeditious procedures for the seismic vulnerability assessment on the European territorial context: reliability, feasibility, cost, and time consumption, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, v. 12, p. 7-8, 1150-1161, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2018.1503375.
-Tavakoli, B. and Ghafouri Ashtiani, M., 1999. Iran Seismic Hazard Map, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Scale: 1: 5,000,000, Tehran, First Edition (in Persian).
-Tavakoli, B. and Ghafouri Ashtiani, M., 1999. Iran Seismic Hazard Map, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Scale: 1: 5,000,000, Tehran, First Edition.
-Uva, G., Sanjust, C.A., Casolo, S. and Mezzina, M., 2016. ANTAEUS project for the regional vulnerability assessment of the current building stock in historical centers. Nternational Journal of Architectural Heritage, v. 10(1), p. 20-43. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.935983.
-Vacareanu, R., Lungu, D., Arion, C. and Aldea, A., 2004. WP07. Seismic risk scenarios handbook, Report, RiskUE Project, Bucharest, 52 p.
-Zare, M., 2016. Introduction to Applied Seismology, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Tehran, 350 p.
پژوهشهای دانش زمین
دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55
پژوهشی
مهر 1402
صفحه 132-154

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار