الگوهای آماری و فرکتالی آرایه شکستگی‌ها در توده گرانیتی شرق بجستان بر پایه تکنیک‌های دورسنجی

نوع مقاله : علمی -پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

تجزیه و تحلیل شدت(I)، تجمع(ρ)، میانگین طول خطواره(µ) و تقاطع(n)، از پارامترهای کاربردی در محاسبات آماری گسلها و شکستگیها است که در واحد سطح بیان می شوند. در این تحقیق بارز سازی خطواره ها با به کار گیری تصویر اسپات5 انجام شد. شکستگیها در دو دسته سیستماتیک با روند های شمال غربی – جنوب شرقی که روند غالب منطقه هستند و شمال شرقی – جنوب غربی دسته بندی شدند. با توجه به وسعت منطقه و میزان توزیع شکستگیها، منطقه به 42 شبکه مربعی با طول ضلع 7/1 کیلومتر تقسیم و سپس الگوی فرکتالی شکستگی های ساختاری منطقه محاسبه شد که بیشترین مقدار آن در جنوب-شرق و غرب منطقه به دست آمد. در مرحله ی بعد پارامترهای فوق برای هر شبکه به طور جداگانه و دستی محاسبه و نقشه کانتور آنها ترسیم شد. بیشترین I و ρ در جنوب شرق، غرب و بیشترینµ و n  به ترتیب در شمال شرق و جنوب شرق منطقه حاصل شدند. AbstractAnalysis of intensity (I), density (ρ), mean lineament trace length (µ) and intersection (n), are the parameters used in the statistical calculations faults and fractures that are expressed per unit area. In this study, enhancement of lineaments has been done with the use of SPOT 5 image. Fractures were classified in two systematic trend northwest - southeast that are the dominant trend in the area and northeast – southwest. According to the area extention and the distribution of fractures, area is divided into 42 square network with a side length of 1.7 kilometers. Then the fractal model of structural fractures area was calculated, the highest disribution rate in southeast and west region was obtained. The above parameters for each network was calculated separately and manual and their contour maps were drawn. The highest I and ρ in southeast, west and the highest µ and n in the northeast and southeast region were obtained respectively. Keywords: Spot 5 image, Remote sensing, Fractal, Bajestan granite. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The study of statistical models and fractal array fractures in the eastern Bajestan granite mass based on remote sensing techniques

چکیده [English]

Analysis of intensity (I), Density (ρ), Mean lineament trace length (µ) and intersection (n), are the parameters used in the statistical calculations faults and fractures that are expressed per unit area. In this study, enhancement of lineaments has been done with the use of SPOT 5 image. Fractures were classified in two systematic trend northwest - southeast that are the dominant area trend and northeast – southwest. According to the area and the distribution of fractures, Area is divided to 42 square network with a side length of 1.7 kilometers. Then the fractal model of structural fractures area was calculated, the highest in southeast and west region was obtained. The above parameters for each network was calculated separately and manual and their contour maps were drawn. The highest I and ρ in southeast, west and the highest µ and n in the northeast and southeast region were obtained respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bajestan granite- Remote sensing- Fractal- Spot 5
  1. احمدی روحانی، ر.، 1391. بارز سازی زونهای آلتراسیونی و ساختار های تکتونیکی در محدوده ی شرق بجستان با استفاده از پردازش Landsat ETM, ASTER, SPOT ، فصلنامه علوم زمین، در نوبت چاپ.
  2. عاشوری. ع.، کریم پور، م.ح.، سعادت، س.،1386. نقشه زمین شناسی1:100.000 بجستان، انتشارات سازمان زمین شناسی و اکتشافات معدنی کشور.
  3. قورچی روکی. م.، سعادت. س.، عاشوری. ع، 1388. پترولوژی، آلتراسیون و کانی سازی توده های نفوذی مناطق طاهرآباد و بجستان، مجله زمین شناسی اقتصادی شماره 1، صفحه 83-101.
  4. کریم پور. م.ح.، ملک زاده شفارودی. آ.، مظاهری. ا.، حیدریان شهری. م.ر .، 1385. ماگماتیزم و انواع کانی سازی مس، طلا، قلع و تنگستن در بلوک لوت،مجموعه مقالات پانزدهمین همایش انجمن بلورشناسی و کانی شناسی ایران، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
  5. References:
  6. Abdullah, A., Nassr, S., and Ghaleeb, A., 2013. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System for Fault Segments Mapping a Study from Taiz Area, Yemen, Journal of Geological Research, doi.org/10.1155/2013/201757.
  7. Alavi, M., 1991. tectonic map of middle east, scale 1: 5,000 000: geological survey of iran, Tehran.
  8. Ali, S.A., and Pirasteh, S., 2004. Geological applications of Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM) data and Geographic Information System (GIS): mapping and structural interpretation in south-west Iran, Zagros Structural Belt: International Journal of Remote Sensing, v. 25, no. 21, p.4715-4727.
  9. Bailey, G.B., and Anderson, P.D., 1982. Applications of Landsat imagery to problems of petroleum exploration in the Qaidam Basin, China. Association of PetroleumGeologists Bulletin, 66, pp. 1348–1354.
  10. Barton. C.C., 1995. Fractal analysis of scaling and spatial clustering of fractures. In: Barton, C.C. and La Ponte, P.R. (ed.), Fractals inthe Earth Sciences. Plenum Press, New York and London, 141–178.
  11. Berhe, S.M., and Rothery, D.A., 1986. Interactive processing of satellite images for structural and lithological mapping in northeast Africa. Geological Magazine, 123, pp. 393–403.
  12. Cello, G., 1997. Fractal analysis of a Quaternary fault array in the central Apennines, Italy. Journal of Structural Geology 19, 945e953.
  13. Drury, S.A., and Holt, R.W., 1980. The tectonic of the south Indian craton: A reconnaissance involving Landsat imagery. Tectonophysics, 65, pp. 1–15.
  14. Drury, S.A., Berhe, S.M., 1993. Accretion tectonics in northern Eritrea revealed by remotely sensed imagery. Geological Magazine 130, 177-190.
  15. Elfouly A., 2000. Major Structure Patterns Identification and Hydrothermal Delination using Density of Lineament Intersections. ASPRS 2000, The Image and Geospacial Information Society, Annual Convention May 23-26, 2000, Washington, DC, USA.
  16. Feder, J., 1988. Fractals. Plenum Press, New York, 283 p.
  17. Greenbaum D., 1985. Review of remote sensing applications to groundwater exploration in basement and regolith. Br Geol Surv Rep OD 85:36
  18. Gupta, R.P. and Sen, A.K., 1988. Imprints of the ninety-east ridge in the Shillong Plateau, Indian Shield. Tectonophysics, 154, pp. 335–341.
  19. Hirata, T., 1989. Fractal dimension of fault systems in Japan: fractal structure in rock fracture geometry at various scales. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 131, 157–169.
  20. ITC, 2001. ILWIS 3.0 Academic User’s Guide: International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Enschede.
  21. Jutz, S.L., Chorowicz, J., 1993. Geological mapping and detection of oblique extensional structures in the Kenyan Rift Valley with a SPOT/LANDSAT-TM data merge. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14, 1677±1688.
  22. Kavak, K. S., and Cetin, H., 2007. “A detailed geologic lineament analysis using landsat TM data of G¨olmarmara/Manisa region, Turkey,” Online Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 145- 153.
  23. La Pointe, P.R., 1988. A method to characterize fracture density and connectivity through fractal geometry. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 25, 421–429.
  24. Leica Geosystems, 1999. ERDAS Field Guide Fifth Edition: ERDAS, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
  25. Lillesand, T.M., and Kiefer, R.W., 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation: New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Masoud, A., and Koike, K., 2006. Tectonic architecture through Landsat-7 ETM+/SRTM DEM-derived lineaments and relationship to the hydrogeologic setting in Siwa region, NW Egypt: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 45, p.467-477.
  27. Minor, T. B., Carter, J. A ., Chesley, M.M., and Knowles, R. B., 1994. “An integrated approach to groundwater exploration in developing countries using GIS and remote sensing,” in Proceedings of the International American Congress on Surveying and Mapping/ American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ACSM/ASPRS ’94), pp. 418–428.
  28. Nash, C.R., Rankin, L.R., Leeming, P.M., Harris, L.B., 1996. Delineation of lithostructural domains in northern Orissa (India) from Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Tectonophysics 260, 245±257.
  29. Nishidai, T. and Berry, J.L., 1990. Structure and hydrocarbon potential of the Tarin Basin (NW China) from satellite imagery. Journal of Petrology and Geology, 13, pp. 35–58.
  30. Peacock, D.C.P., and Sanderson, D.J.,1995. Strike–slip relay ramps. J. Struct. Geol., 17, 1351- 1360.
  31. Pohn, H.A., 1981. Joint spacing as a method of locating faults. Geology 9, 258- 261.
  32. Sabins Jr, F.F., 1987. Remote Sensing. Principles and Interpretation. W. H. Freeman and Co, New York, 449 pp.
  33. Salvi, S., 1995. Analysis and interpretation of Landsat Synthetic Stereo Pair for the detection of Active Fault Zone in the Abruzzi Region (Central Italy). Remote Sensing of Environment, 53, pp. 153–163.
  34. Sayab. M., et al, 2005. 2D fractal analysis of synfolding fractures in the Khushalgrah area, eastern Kohat plateau, northern Pakistan. Geol. Bull. Univ. Peshawar.
  35. Seung-Ik Park., Young-Seog Kim., Chung-Ryul Ryoo., David J. Sanderson., 2010, Fractal analysis of the evolution of a fracture network in a granite outcrop, SE Korea. 14, No. 2, p. 201 − 215, June 2010.
  36. Shankar Babu Pokharel., 2007. Remote sensing and GIS analysis of spatial distribution of fracture patterns in the Makran accretionary prism, southeast Iran. Department of Geosciences, Geosciences Theses. Paper 8, pp. 1- 100.
  37. Stewart, I.S., Hancock, P.L., 1990. Brecciation and fracturing within neotectonic normal fault zones in the Aegean region. In: Knipe, R.J., Rutter, E.H. (Eds.), Deformation Mechanisms, Rheology and Tectonics. Special Publication 54, Geological Society of London, pp. 105-119.
  38. Stocklin, J., Nabavi M.H., 1973. “Tectonic map of Iran”, Geological Survey of Iran.
  39. Wheeler, R.L., Dixon, J.M., 1980. Intensity of systematic joints: methods and application. Geology 8, 230-233.
  40. Xypolias, P., Koukouvelas, I. 2004. Fault trace parameters as a tool for analyzing remotely sensed fault arrays: an example from the eastern Gulf of Corinth. INT. J. REMOTE SENSING (in press).