Geological and sedimentological characteristics and paleo-environmental conditions of sedimentary - ancient section of Gaskarak in Roudbar county

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Natural Heritage, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran

2 Geoarchaeology Research Group, Zaminrizkavan Co. Ltd, Tehran, Iran

3 Guilan Province Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism, Gilan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Geoarchaeology is a new and interdisciplinary concept that studies the past of human history using
geological methods. In geoarchaeology, a complete and accurate understanding of ancient records can
be obtained by identifying and examining the sedimentary content and stratigraphy of archeological
layers and materials. Geology has been available to archaeologists over the past two decades as a basic
tool for reconstructing ancient environments and understanding the long-term climatic and
anthropogenic conditions and interactions of pre-historic human and surrounding environments. These
studies are particularly influential in understanding the Pleistocene and Holocene archaeological and
geological backgrounds and materials. Meanwhile, geoarchaeological studies of Iran are practically
linked to Paleolithic observations and exploration and the use of geological methods such as
sedimentology to describe the details of ancient records in caves and rock shelters. Geoarchaeology is
an interdisciplinary specialty between geological sciences and archeology that examines the role of
geological factors in the formation, continuation, and weakening of ancient settlements. In this field,
techniques and methods common in earth science such as aerial photography and satellite imagery,
sampling, microscopic studies, chemical analysis, etc. are used to solve archaeological problems. On
the other hand, often referred to as archaeo-geology, archaeological data are used to solve geological
problems, particularly in relation to dating of Quaternary deposits, ancient seismological studies, and
ancient mining. Large-scale archaeologists study most of the natural landforms and anthropogenic
structures and small-scale archaeologists study the soil, natural sediments, and anthropogenic deposits.
Archaeo-geology also occasionally covers other interdisciplinary studies such as pottery petrography,
ancient mineralogy, ancient metallurgy, dating, etc. and so-called archaeometry.
Materials and Methods
In order to determine the frequency of sediment grains based on their size and to investigate the pattern
of particle size distribution to determine the textural properties, the sorting of grains and the sedimentary
abundances of two natural sediment layers I and II were extracted from Gaskarak section and analyzed
by laser particle size analyzer. Organic matter and carbonate bind the sediment particles to each other
and therefore, to determine the true distribution of particle size, they must be removed prior to analysis
of the samples to separate the sediment particles. The mixing and rotating system of the device will
cause the particle to move and be exposed to the laser beam.
So after the laser light from a high voltage source is exposed to the sample, the laser beam will reflect
from the sample surface and then pass through it. The size of the deposited particles is directly
proportional to the magnitude of the reflected laser light and to the angle of refraction of the laser beam
to the surface of the particle, so that with increasing diameter of the deposited particles, the intensity of
the reflected laser light increases, but its angle of failure decreases.
Results and Discussion
Gaskarak section consists of two layers of fine-grained alluvial-debris sediment, with distinct color
which their lower boundary is confined to the sedimentary bedrock and their upper boundary is covered
by more recent deposits. The natural sediments that form these two layers are silty particles that show
high density. The lower layer (I) is mainly composed of silty fine-grained sediments with calcareous
fragments. Layer II, covered at its upper bound by the natural and cultural deposits of the Bronze Age
is characterized by a charcoal inclination that distinguishes it from its lower layer. Study of the recent
samples suggests dry to semi-arid climatic conditions for the formation of carbonated horizons in the
soil. Low carbonate content, reddish-brown color, as well as the presence of charcoal fragments in layer
II, which is distinct from layer I, suggest a different environmental condition for layer II that seems it
has been facing simultaneous climate changes, such as increasing rainfall and humidity and expanding
forest vegetation in the region.
Conclusion
Field evidence and results of laboratory studies indicate that the natural deposits of the Gaskarak section
probably formed as abnormal sediments on ancient hillslope surfaces of sedimentary bedrock. As the
morphology and slope of the sedimentary layers show a valley-like position, the eroded material
accumulates from sections with higher topography within it. The natural sediments of the Gaskarak
section are distinguished by two distinct layers (I and II) that show distinct differences in color,
carbonate content, and mineral and organic fragments.

Keywords


  1. -بیگلری، ف.، جهانی، و.، مشکور، م. و امینی، ص.، 1393. گمانه‌زنی در مکان پارینه‌سنگی قدیم غار دربند رشی رودبار گیلان، دوازدهمین گردهمایی سالانه باستان‌شناسی ایران، تهران، پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری، پژوهشکده باستان‌شناسی، ص 101-104.
  2. -جهانی، و. و بابایف، ا.، 1397. شواهدی نویافته از معماری محوطه‌های استقراری هزاره‌های دوم و اول قبل از میلاد در کرانه‌های جنوب‌غرب دریای کاسپی (گیلان)، مطالعات باستان‌شناسی، دوره 10، شماره 2، ص 47-65.
  3.  
  4.  
  5. -Akeret, Ö. and Rentzel, P., 2001. Micromorphology and plant macrofossil analysis of cattle dung from the Neolithic lake shore settlement of Arbon Bleiche 3. Geoarchaeology, v. 16, p. 687-700.
  6. -Amini, S., Saed, M.A. and Salehvand, N., 2011. Archeological geology: definitions, methods and it’s applications in archeology of IRAN. Archeology of IRAN, v. 2, p. 3-22.
  7. -Amos, F., Shimron, A. and Rosenbaum, J., 2003. Radiometric dating of the Siloam Tunnel, Jerusalem, Nature, v. 425, p. 169-171.
  8. -Arpin, T., Mallol, C. and Goldberg, P., 2002. A new method of analyzing and documenting Micromorphological thin sections using flatbed scanners: applications in geoarchaeological studies. Geoarchaeology, v. 17, p. 305-313.
  9. -Ashley, G.M. and Driese, S.G., 2000. Paleopedology and paleohydrology of a volcaniclastic paleosol interval; implications for early Pleistocene stratigraphy and paleoclimate record, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 70, p. 1065-1080.
  10. -Barham, A.J. and Macphail, R.I., 1995. Archaeological sediments and soils: analysis, interpretation and management: London, Institute of Archaeology University College London.
  11. -Barham, A.J., 1995. Methodological approaches to archaeological context recording: X-radiography as an example of a supportive recording, assessment and interpretive technique. In: Archaeological Sediments and Soils: Analysis, Interpretation and Management (Eds A.J. Barham and R.I. Macphail), p. 145–182. Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London.
  12. -Bell, M., 1983. Valley sediments as evidence of prehistoric land use on the South Downs, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, v. 49, p. 118-150.
  13. -Bewley, R., 1984. Excavations in the Zagros Mountains. The Cambridge University Archeological Expedition to Iran. Houmian, Mir Malas and Brade Spid, Iran, v. 22, p. 1-38.
  14. -Biglari, F. and Heidari, S., 2001. Do-ashkaft: a recently discovered Mousterian cave site in the Kermanshah plain, Iran. Antiquity, v. 75, p. 8-487.
  15. -Brochier, J.E., Villa, P. and Giacomarra, M., 1992. Shepherds and Sediments: geo-ethnoarchaeology of pastoral sites. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, v. 11, p. 47-102.
  16. -Brookes, I., Levine, D. and Dennell, R.W., 1982. Alluvial sequence in Central West Iran and implications for archeological survey, Journal of Field Archeology, v. 3, p. 285-299.
  17. -Fuchs, M. and Lang, A., 2001. OSL dating of coarse-grain fluvial quartz using single-aliquot protocols on sediments from NE Peloponnese, Greece. Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 20, p. 783-787.
  18. -Goldberg, P. and Macphail, R.I., 2006. Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Department of Archaeology, Boston University and Institute of Archaeology, University College London, Blackwell Publishing, 479 p.
  19. -Macphail, R.I., 2000. Soils and microstratigraphy: a soil micromorphological and micro-chemical approach. In: Potterne 1982–5: Animal Husbandry in Later Prehistoric Wiltshire (Ed A.J. Lawson), Archaeology Report, Wessex Archaeology, and Salisbury, v. 17, p. 47-70.
  20. -Rink, W.J., 2001. Beyond 14C dating. In: Earth Sciences and Archaeology (Eds P. Goldberg, V.T. Holliday and C.R. Ferring), Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, p. 385-417.
  21. -Rink, W.J., Bartoll, J., Goldberg, P. and Ronen, A., 2003. ESR dating of archaeologically relevant authigenic terrestrial apatite veins from Tabun Cave, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science, p. 30, v. 1127-1138.
  22. -Shaw, I. and Jameson, R., 1999. A dictionary of archeology, Massachusetts, Blackwell Publishing, 345 p.
  23. -Thomas, J., 2000. Introduction: the polarities of post-processual archeology, interpretative archeology a reader, Julian Thomas (ed.). London and New York, Leicester University Press, p. 1-18.
  24. -Wright, H.E., 1960. Climate and prehistoric man in the Eastern Mediterranean, Prehistoric investigation in Iraqi Kurdistan, R. Braidwood and B. Howe (eds.), studies in ancient oriental civilization, the University of Chicago Press, v. 31, p. 71-98.
  25. -Zeuner, F.E., 1946. Dating the past, an introduction to geochronology, Methuen and Co. Ltd., London. p. 467.