Selecting the best scenario for urban waste management using life cycle assessment method and SWOT matrix (Case study: Behbahan county)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Environment, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The development of urbanization and the growing population of cities and consequently the large increase in the volume of municipal waste, has made solid waste management an important problem in urban planning. Waste is an inevitable product of any society and waste management is one of the main needs of that society. The present study in 2021-2022 has used the life cycle evaluation approach and SWOT matrix in order to select the best scenario of Behbahan city’s waste management system.
Materials and Methods
The study area produces an average of 120 tons of waste per day, of which 91% of waste is collected during the day and 9% at night. Per capita waste production is more than 900 grams per person. The share of waste production for each sector is as following: the residential sector is 76%, commercial 7%, industrial 5%, educational 2%, horticulture 6% and office and services 4%. 75% to 83% of residential waste is perishable materials and according to the analysis, about 79% of Behbahan city’s waste are perishable materials. Life cycle evaluation was carried out for the 5 following scenarios: 1- Recycling, compost and unhygienic landfill 2- Recycling, compost and sanitary landfill 3- Recycling and unsanitary landfill, 4- Recycling, incinerator and sanitary landfill 5- Recycling, anaerobic compost and digestion, incinerator and sanitary burial. Life cycle logging was done using IWM-2 model. Also, SWOT model was used to analyze the performance and status of gaps. It was considered to identify the threats and opportunities in the external environment of a system and to identify its internal strengths and weaknesses based on municipal waste management in order to assess the situation of the study area. Required data were collected by reviewing sources, preparing a questionnaire and field visits.
Results and discussion
In this study, the third scenario is the current situation in the region and in terms of toxic emissions and ecological indicators, among all scenarios, it is the most environmental hazardous. Energy consumption in the first and fifth scenarios was higher than other scenarios due to unsanitary burial. The third and fifth scenarios have the most and the least role in methane production, respectively. According to the ecological index, the scenario of recycling, compost and anaerobic digestion, incinerator and sanitary burial is the best scenario. The third scenario is the worst-case scenario with the highest pollution load. The most important strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats according to the SWOT model are the use of appropriate urban transport machinery, lack of information about recycling and compost and landfilling of hospital and industrial waste with municipal waste, respectively. The implementation of the compost project was achieved using new technologies, abiding existing environmental laws and regulations and considering the proximity of municipal waste disposal to rural and residential areas.
Conclusion
The results obtained from the life cycle and the SWOT matrix can only be presented to decision makers through an environmental point of view. In order to make comprehensive decisions, economic and social factors must also be combined with environmental factors in evaluation and decision-making. Therefore, life cycle impact assessment methods and different models that exist to perform this assessment can be used to select and compare different waste management options and provide the best and most effective option for implementation, both ecologically and economically.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Persian References:
-Akbarian, M., Rezaian, A.H. and Rashidi, A., 2016. Comparison of commercial software for life cycle assessment, 14th National Conference on Environmental Impact Assessment. Iran, Tehran.
-Abedinzadeh, N., Abedinzadeh, F. and Abedi, T., 2010. Investigation of strategic factors of Rasht urban waste management using SWOT method and formation of QSPM matrix, Environmental Science journal, v. 37(57), p. 93-104.
-Hajati Siaberi, N. and Imani, A., 2013. Evaluation of environmental variables based on SWOT model, in urban waste management (Case study: Sumeh Sara city), the first international conference of economics, management, accounting and social sciences of Rasht.
-Hassani, M., Moradi, H., Jamalinejad, M. and Khodashenas, M., 2015. Review of different methods of waste management in Isfahan with a life cycle assessment approach. The second conference on planning and environmental management.
-Khanpour Aghdam, S., Ghanbarzadeh Lak, M., Mohtadi, M. and Saboor, M.R., 2009. Evaluation of final municipal solid waste disposal options using a combination of life cycle assessment methods and AHP (Case study: Tehran), Environmental Science and Technology journal, v. 21(2), May 2009.
-Naderi, M., Mo'rab, Y. and Amiri, M.J., 2017. Evaluation of Life Cycle Scenarios in Waste Management Strategies of Mahdasht City, Scientific-Research Geographical Space juornL, Islamic Azad University, Ahar Branch, Year 17, v. 5, p. 95-110.
-Shah Nazari, M., Jalili Ghazizadeh, M. and Shahbazi, A., 2017. Investigation of Urban Waste Disposal Options with Life Cycle Assessment Approach (Case Study: Ramsar Tourist City), Civil Engineering and Environment Journal, University of Tabriz, v. 38-39, p. 47-87.
-Rahmani, K., Dadashkhah, Z., Ali Qhadri, M., Mokhtari, A. and Nazari, H., 2018. Environmental assessment of life cycle of urban waste management system based on LCAIWM modeling. Case study: Rasht city. Environmental Health engineering journal, summer 2018, Year 6, v. 4, p. 449-456.
-Rakhshani Nasab, H.R. and Safari, K., 2016. Strategic planning of waste management in Zahedan city by SWOT method, Environmental Science and Technology journal, v. 18(3).
-Rafiei, R., Salman Mahini, A.R. and Khorasani, N., 2008. Environmental Assessment of Life Cycle of Urban Waste Management System (Case Study: Mashhad), Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources journal, v. 16(2), p. 208-220.
-Zazoli, M.A., Karimi, Z. and Rafiei, R., 2009. Selecting the best options for urban waste management using life cycle assessment tools (Case study: Noor City), Health and Environment journal, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Scientific Research Quarterly, v. 12(4), p. 607-620.
-Zoghi, M.J., Ghavidel, A. and Saeedi, M., 2016. Comparison of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Waste Management Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Environmental Science and Technology journal, v. 18(2.
 
English References:
 
-Abduli, M.A., Naqhib, A., Yonesi, M. and Akbari, A., 2011. Life cycle assessment (LCA (of solid waste management strategies in Tehran: landfill and composting plus landfill, Environ mental monitoring and Assessment, v. 178(1-4(, p. 487-498.
-Abdoli, M.A., 2006. Municipal solid waste recovery (Reduction-Reuse-Recycle). University of Tehran Press, 364 p. (In Persian).
-Agwu, M.O., 2012. Issues and challenges of solid waste management practices in Port Harcourt city, Nigeria, Am. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, v. 32. p. 83-92.
-Ahmed, S., Hazilah, N., Manaf, A.B.D. and Rafikul, I., 2017. Measuring quality performance between public and private hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, v. 17, p. 112-129.
-Buttol, P., Masoni, P., Bonoli, A., Goldoni, S., Belladonna, V. and Cavazzuti, C., 2007. LCA of integrated MSW management systems: case study of the Bologna district, Waste Management, v. 27, p. 1059-1070.
-Boustead, I., Chaffee, C., Dove, W.T. and Yaros, R.B., 2000. Eco-Indices: What can they tell us? v. 53-58, 58 p.
-Christensen, T.H., Damgaard, A., Levis, J., Zhao, Y., Björklund, A. and Arena, U., 2020. Application of LCA modelling in integrated waste management. Waste Management. v. 118, p. 313-322.
-Goulart, C., Lineker, M. and Lange, L.C., 2018. Applying life cycle assessment to support environmentally sustainable waste management strategies in Brazil, Resources, journal Conservation and Recycling, v. 128, p. 438-450.
-Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P. and Buonamici, R., 2011. Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, v. 45(1), p. 90-96.
-Hadzic, A., Neven, V. and Sandra, G., 2018. Life-cycle assessment of solid-waste management in city of Zagreb, Croatia, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, v. 20(2), p. 1286-1298.
-Huijbregts, M.A., Schopp, W., Verkuijlen, E., Heijungs, R. and Reijnders, L., 2000. Spatially explicit characterization of acidifying and eutrifying air pollution in life cycle assessment. J, Ind, Eco, v. 4(3), p. 125-142.
-Khandelwal, H.D., Hiya, T., Arun, K. and Kumar, S., 2019. Application of life cycle assessment in municipal solid waste management, a worldwide critical review, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 209, p. 630-654.
-Khoshnevisan, B., Tabatabaei, M., Tsapekos, P., Rafiee, S., Aghbashlo, M., Lindeneg, S. and Angelidaki, I., 2020. Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid, journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 117.
-Moh, Y. and Manaf , L.A.B.D., 2017. Solid waste management transformation and future challenges of source separation and recycling practice in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 116, p.1-14.
-Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Kaab, A., Hosseini-Fashami, F., Mostashari-Rad, F. and Chau, K.W., 2019. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate different waste management opportunities.  Book: advances in waste-to-energy technologies: Taylor & Francis Group, p. 195-216.
-Rajaeifar, M.A., Ghanavati, H., Dashti, B.B., Heijungs, R., Aghbashlo, M. and Tabatabaei, M., 2017. Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies, a comparative review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 79, p. 414-439.
-Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G. and Trivedi, R.C., 2008. Municipal solid waste manage-ment in Indian cities, A review, Waste Management, v. 28, p. 459-467.
-Ozeler, D., Yetis, U. and Demirer, G.N., 2006. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study, Environment International, v. 32(3), p. 405-424.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics