Application of fold style elements for estimation of strain parameters (Case study: Asmari horizon of Karanj oil field)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Strain analysis in natural deformed rocks is very important for understanding the strain states in different parts of the earth's crust. Using data that can be collected in the field, and applying different methods in strain studies, geologists will be able to measure quantitative amounts of strain in various geological structures. Since geologists are always dealing with the latest deformed products in the earth's crust, they will be able to perform finite strain analysis in structural features or deformed rocks (Ramsay and Hubber, 1983). If geologists need to investigate the changes of incremental strain values at any moment of time in different parts of a structure, the use of laboratory and numerical modeling will be inevitable. In carrying out numerical analysis of strain, it is very important to find elements that can be used as indicators in strain measurement. Several methods have been presented by different researchers to estimate strain values in metamorphic rocks. Methods such as Rf/Φ method (Ramsay and Hubber, 1983), Fry method (Fry, 1979), Bridin method, Wellman method, and the method of preparing balanced cross sections (Ferhner and Grasemann, 2012; Lopez-Mir, 2019) are the most common methods of strain studies, which are used by Structural geologist in different natural deformed areas. Usually, two-dimensional strain studies can help to understand the characteristics of strain ellipsoid in three dimensions. There are several mathematical methods that help to structural geologist for understand the 3D nature of strain from 2D studies. Using of graphical functions is very common in many strain studies. In recent decades, the use of graphical functions (Nomograms) as a quick and simple method in strain analysis is used by many researchers (Ramsay and Hubber, 1983; Imber et al, 2012; Fossen, 2016; Sarkarinrjad et al, 2017, Keshavarz and Faghih, 2020). In this research, the amounts of strain ratio and shortening value in deferent parts of Karanj anticline oil field have been calculated with application of seismic profiles and using fold style elements.
 
Materials and Methods
In this research, using interpreted seismic sections, some parameters of the fold style elements in the Karanj anticline oil field have been investigated. Interlimb angle, folding angle, geometry of the axial surface, bluntness and fold aspect ratio were determined. Also the Ramsay and Fourier classification were made for deferent part of anticline. By applying the interlimb angle value and by using graphical functions, the fold aspect ratio of Karanj anticline was calculated in different parts. Also, using the fold aspect ratio-shortening and shortening-strain ratio nomograms, the values of shortening and strain ratio were estimated for different parts of anticline.




Application of fold style elements for estimation of strain parameters                                                                                     Samani et al, / 20




Results and Discussion
The analyzes based on the value of the curvature of the folded surfaces between the hinge and inflection points of the fold show that the Karanj anticline is located in the range of sinusoidal to parabolic folds based on the Fourier division and according to the almost equal curvature of the folded surfaces and uniformity The real thickness of the folded layer is placed in the class 1B group of folds. The fold bluntness parameter is measured based on the ratio of the radius of curvature at the fold closure to the radius of curvature tangent to the edges of the fold at the inflection points of the fold. According to the results, the Karanj anticline with the value of b=0.22 to b=0.64 is sub-angular to sub-rounded folds. The measurement of the interlimb angle in different parts of the Asmara horizon shows a gentle to open fold. Using the interlimb angle values and application of interlimb angle-fold aspect ratio nomogram, the values of the fold aspect ratio of the Karanj anticline were determined in the range of 0.15 to 0.44. Based on this amounts, the general geometry of the Karanj anticline is placed in the group of broad to wide folds. In order to determine the amount of shortening and the strain ratio in Asmari folded layer, various mathematical relationships and graphical functions have been presented (Ramsay and Hubber, 1983; Bastida et al., 2005, 2007; Ghassemi et al., 2010). It is possible to measure the shortening values by using the fold aspect ratio and using equation 1.
Eq. 1)
 P = 0.5(1/(1+e)2-1)0.5                                        
Also, by using shear strain and determining the values of the square of elongation (Equation, 2), it is possible to determine the values of the strain ratio (Equation, 3).
Eq. 2)
 λ1 or λ3 = 1/2 (γ2+2±γ(γ2+4)1/2)                     
Eq 3)
R2= λ1/ λ3                                                       
In order to determine the values of the strain ratio using equation 4, it is also possible to use the values of the fold aspect ratios (Ghassemi et al, 2010).
Eq 4)
P= 0.5(R-1)0.5     or    R= 4P2+1                         
Also, by using the equation 5, it is possible to establish a relationship between the shortening values and the strain ratio.
Eq 5)
e = (1/R0.5)-1                                                    
In this research, using graphical functions, the values of shortening and strain ratio were determined along the seismic profiles in different parts of the Asmari horizon for the Karanj anticline. The results of this research show that the Karanj oil field anticline is an asymmetric fold with different amounts of interlimb angel along the anticline. Based on the analysis, the values of interlimb angle are not the same throughout the Karanj anticline and it shows lower values in the central parts than in the northern and southern parts of the anticline. Based on the amounts of interlimb angles in different parts, the Karanj anticline is mainly can be categorized in the gentle to open folds. Based on the amounts of bluntness the Karanj anticline is placed in the sub-angular to sub-rounded folds. According to the dip isogon patterns (Ramzay method) and Fourier analysis the Karanj anticline is categorized in the 1B and Sinusoidal to parabolic folds. Based on the strain analyses the values of the strain ratio and shortening percentage in the central parts of the anticline show higher values than the northern and southern parts.
 
Conclusion
Based on the fold style elements and strain analyses of the Karanj anticline oil field, the following results were obtained:
- The interlimb angles along the Karanj anticline are varying between 74 to 140 degrees.
- The bluntness values of the Karanj anticline oil field is 0.22<b<0.64 and shows the geometry of sub-angular to sub-rounded fold. 
- The fold aspect ratio for the Karanj anticline is between (0.15 to 0.44) and based on these amounts shows the geometry of broad to wide folds.    
- Also, the results show the shortening values between 7.5% to 32% and strain ratio values in the range of 1.25 to 1.45 in different parts of the anticline.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Alavi, M., 2004. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran, and its proforeland evolution. American Journal of Science, v. 304, p.1-20, doi: 10.2475/ajs.304.1.1.
Alavi, M., 2007. Structures of the zagros fold-thrust belt in Iran.American journal of science, v. 307, p. 1064-1095.
Aller, J., Bastida, F., Toimil, N.C. and Bobillo-Ares, N.C., 2004. The use of conic sections for the geometrical analysis of folded surface profiles. Tectonophysics, v. 379, p. 239-254.
Azizi, E., Khatib, M.M. and Ghorbani Ghashgaei, A., 2012. Analysis of a fault-related folding a blind fault in karanj oil field. Iranian Geology Journal, v. 18, p. 31-40.
Bastida, F., Aller, J., Bobillo-Ares, N.C. and Toimil, N.C., 2005. Fold geometry: a basis for their kinematical analysis. Earth Science Reviews, v. 70, p. 129e164.
Bastida, F., Aller, J., Toimil, N.C., Lisle, R.J. and Bobillo-Ares, N.C., 2007. Some considerations on the kinematics of chevron folds. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 29, p. 1185-1200.
Berberian, M., 1995. Master ‘blind’ thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics, Tectonophysics, v. 241, p. 193-224.
Berberian, M. and King, G.C.P., 1981. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 18, p. 210-265.
Blance, E.J.P., Allen, M.B., Inger, S. and Hassani, H., 2003. Structural styles in the Zagros Simple Folded Zone, Iran. J. Geol. Soc., v. 160, p. 401-412. doi:10.1144/0016-764902-110.
Bordenave, M.L. and Hegre, J.A., 2005. The influence of tectonics on the entrapment of oil in the Dezful Embayment, Zagros Foldbelt, Iran. Journal of petroleum geology, v. 28(4), p. 339-368.
Breddin, H., 1956. Die tektonische Deformation derFossilien im Rheinischen Schiefergebirge. ZeitschriftDeutsche Geologische Gesellschaft, v. 106, p. 227-305.
Dixon, J.M. and Liu, S., 1992. Centrifuge modelling of the propagation of thrust faults. In: McClay, K.R. (Ed.), Thrust Tectonics. Chapman & Hall, London, p. 53e69.
Espurt, N., Hippolyte, J.C., Sillard, M. and Bellier, O., 2012. Geometry and kinematic evolution of a long-living foreland structure inferred from field data and cross section balancing, the Sainte-Victoire System, Provence, France. Tectonics, v. 31, TC4021, doi: 10.1029/2011TC002988.
Faghih, A., Dehghan, M. and Sobhani, S.S., 2023. Study of deformation pattern and kinematic characteristics in the Gelmandeh metamorphic complex, Saghand region, Central Iran. Advanced Applied Geology, v. 12(4), p.
617-634.
Falcon, N.L., 1974. Problems of the relationship between surface structures and deep displacements illustrated by the Zagros range. Geological Society of London. Spec. Pub., v. 3, p. 9-22.
Fergosson, C., Nutman, A., Mohajjel, M. and Bennett, V.C., 2016. The Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone in the Neo-Tethyansuture, western Iran: Zircon U–Pb evidence of latePalaeozoic rifting of northern Gondwana and mid-Jurassic orogenesis, Gondwana Research, v. 58, p. 216-238.
Frehner, M.D. and Grasemann, B., 2012. Mechanical versus kinematical shortening reconstructions of theZagros High Folded Zone (Kurdistan region of Iraq), Tectonics, v. 31, TC3002, doi:10.1029/2011TC003010.
Fry, N., 1979.  Random point distribution and strain measurements in rocks. Tectonophysics 60:89-105.
Fossen, H., 2016. Structural Geology, Cambridge University Press.
Jeng, F.S., Lai, Y.C. and Teng, M.H., 2002. Influence of strain rate on buckle folding of an elasto-viscous single layer. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 24, p. 501-516.
Ghassemi, M.R., Schmalholz, S.M. and Ghassemi, A.R., 2010. Kinematics of constant arc length folding for different fold shapes. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 32, 755e765.
Imber, J., Perry, T., Jones, R. and Wightman, Rh., 2012. Do cataclastic deformation bands form parallel to lines of no finite elongation (LNFE) or zero extension direction? Journal of Structural Geology, v. 45, p. 158-172.
Keshavarz, S. and Faghih, F., 2020. Heterogeneous sub–simple deformation in the Gol–e–Gohar shear zone (Zagros, SW Iran): insights from microstructural and crystal fabric analyses. Int. J. Earth Sci., v. 109, p. 421-438. DOI: 10.1007/s00531-019-01812-9.
Keshavarz, S., Faghih, A., Shahpasandzadeh, M. and Zarei, S., 2018. Steady state deformation in the shear zones of the Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt, Neyriz region, Journal of Tectonics, v. 2(5), p. 97-109
Keshavarz, S., Faghih, A., Asadi, S., Soleimani, M. and Zarei, S., 2024. PT conditions of deformation of the Gol-e-Gohar shear Zone, SW Iran: Insights from analysis of quartz c-axis fabrics, recrystallization mechanisms and syndeformational fluid inclusions. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 262, 106010.
Lopez-Mir, B., 2019. Cross section construction and balancing: example from the Spanish Pyrenees, Development in Structural Geology and Tectonics, v. 5, p. 3-23.
McQuarrie, N., 2004. Crustal scale geometry of the Zagros fold–thrust belt, Iran. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 26, p. 519-535.
Mohajjel, M. and Fergusson, C.L., 2000. Dextral transpression in Late Cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran, Journal of Structural Geology, v. 22, p. 1125-139.
Molinaro, M., Zeyen, H. and Laurencin, X., 2005. Lithospheric structure beneath the southeastern Zagros Mountains, Iran: Recent slab break-off? Terra Nova, v. 17, p. 1-6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2004.00575.x.
Partabian, A. and Faghih, A., 2021. Doming along the Zagros transpression zone, SW Iran: insights from microstructural analysis of heterogeneous deformation. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, v. 14, p. 1-19
Ramsay, J.G. and Hubber, M.I., 1983. The techniques of modern structural geology, 1: strain analysis. Academic Press, London.
Rez, J., 2015. Statect software, www.eltekto.cz.
Sadeghi, S. and Yassaghi, A., 2016. Spatial evolution of Zagros collision zone in Kurdistan, NW Iran: constraints on Arabia–Eurasia oblique convergence. Solid Earth, v. 7, p. 659-672, doi: 10.5194/se-7-659-2016.
Saedi, G., Soleimani, B., Samani, B. and Arzani, A., 2022. The interaction between faults and in-situ stress on the kinematic and subsurface natural fracture of Aghajari oilfield in southwest of Iran. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, v. 208, 109567.
Samani, B., 2017. Deformation flow analysis and symmetry of Goushti shear zone, Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt, Iran. Geopersia, v. 7, p. 117-130.
Samani, B., 2013. Quartz c-axis evidence for deformation characteristics in the Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt, Iran, Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 81, p. 28-34.
Samani, B., Tahmasebi, L., Charchi, A. and Talebi, H., 2024. Strain and shortening variations along the Maroon anticline oil field, Khuzestan province, Scientific Quarterly Journal of Geosciences, v. 34, p. 87-98 (In Persian).
Sarkarinejad, K. and Azizi, A., 2008. Slip partitioning and inclined dextral transpression along the Zagros Thrust System, Iran. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 30, p. 116-136.
Sarkarinejad, K., Keshavarz, S., Fafgih, A. and Samani, B., 2017. Kinematic analysis of rock flow and deformation temperature of the Sirjan thrust sheet, Zagros Orogen, Iran. Geological Magazine, v. 154, p. 147-165.
Schmalholz, S.M., 2006. Scaled amplification equation: a key to the folding history of buckled viscous single-layers, Tectonophysics, v. 419, p. 41-53.
Sepehr, M., Cosgrove, J. and Moinei, M., 2006. The impact of cover rock rheology on the style of folding in the Zagros fold-thrust belt, Tectonophysics, v. 427(1-4), p. 265-281.
Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J. and Frizon de Lamotte, D., 2006. Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): new insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling. Tectonics, v. 25, TC4007. doi:10.1029/2004TC001766.
Sherkati, S., Molinaro, M., Frizon Delamotte, D. and Letouzey, J., 2005. Detachment folding in the Central and Eastern Zagros fold-belt (Iran): salt mobility, multiple detachments and late basement control. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 27, p. 1680-1696.
Soleimani, M., Faghih, A., Bagherpour, B., Adibinejad, M. and Sobhani, S.S., 2023. Deformation microthermometry in the Toutak gneiss dome based on petrofabric characteristics of quartz crystal, Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt, Iran, Advanced Applied Geology (In Press).
Soleimani, M., Faghih, A. and Kusky, T., 2021. Mesozoic compressional to extensional tectonics in the Central East Iranian Microcontinent: evidence from the Boneh Shurow metamorphic core complex, Journal of the Geological Society, v. 178(6), jgs2020-123.
Stabler, C.L., 1968. Simplified Fourier analysis of fold shapes, Tectonophysics, v. 6, p. 343-350.
Stocklin, J., 1968. Structural history and tectonics of Iran, a review, A. A. P. G. Bull., v. 52(7), p. 1229-1258.
Takin, M., 1972. Iranian geology and continental drift in the Middle East. Nature, v. 235, p. 147-150.
Talebian, M. and Jackson, J., 2004. A reappraisal of earthquake focal mechanisms and active shortening in the Zagros mountains of Iran. Geophysics, v. 156, p. 506-526.
Teyssier, C., 1985. A crustal thrust system in an intracratonic tectonic environment. Journal of Structural Geology, v. 7(6), p. 689-700.
Vatandoust, M., Faghih, A. and Asadi, S., 2019. Study of Tectonic Events and Their Role on Characteristics of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in the Karanj, Paranj and Parsi Oilfields Using Subsurface and Fluid Inclusion Data, PhD thesis, Shiraz University.
Vernant, P. and Chery, J., 2006. Mechanical modeling of oblique convergence in the Zagros, Iran, Geophysics, v. 165, p. 991-1002.